Floating Production Rebound Continues

February 10, 2020

© Lukasz Z / Adobe Stock
© Lukasz Z / Adobe Stock

Activity in the deepwater sector took a huge hit in the second half of last decade as a result of a global oil demand/supply imbalance, downturn in oil prices, hiatus in Petrobras production floater orders and large industry cutbacks in upstream spending. The downturn was the worst to ever hit the offshore sector. Orders for new equipment dried up, backlog fell and many suppliers were forced to cut personnel, while others were forced out of business. But the downturn has bottomed, and orders for production floaters are on the uptick, a large portfolio of new projects are in the planning stage and underlying market conditions are favorable to deepwater investment decisions.

Growing Number of Production Floaters
The number of floating production systems in operation has steadily increased since startup of the first production floater in the mid-1970s. Ten years were needed to reach 15 units in operation. By the end of the second decade more than 50 units were in operation. At the end of the third decade the number had grown to around 170 units in service. Now there are just under 300 production floaters in service or available – and another 29 on order.

Floating Production Units Installed, On Order and Available (As of 1/1/20)
Floater TypeTotalInstalledOn OrderAvailable
All Units3252722924
Source: IMA/World Energy Reports Database

But growth in production units has not escaped the long-term S-curve pattern typical of all industries. Growth in number of production floaters has slowed as field decommissioning offset new project starts. From 2005-2009, the number of floating production, storage and offloading units (FPSO) and floating production units (FPU) in operation or available grew 39%. From 2010-14 growth was 19% – and from 2015-19 the number of units grew 3%.

The 10-Year Trend in Orders
Contracts for 123 production floaters have been placed over the past 10 years – an average of around 12 units annually. FPSOs accounted for 97 of the contracts, and FPUs for 26 contracts. Included in the FPU contracts were 12 production semis, six tension-leg platforms (TLP), five spars and three barges. A high of 27 contracts was reached in 2010 when Petrobras ordered the hulls for eight serial FPSOs (two were subsequently canceled, one later rebid). The low was in 2016 when no orders were placed.

Orders returned in 2017 as the oil market recovered, and over the past three years 32 production floaters have been ordered, including 25 FPSOs and seven FPUs.

FPSO orders since 2017 include nine large units for use by Petrobras in Brazil (seven) and by ExxonMobil in Guyana (two). Not counted in the FPSO total are two speculative FPSO hulls ordered by SBM in December 2019 – they will be included when a field contract is executed. In 2020 there has been one FPSO order as of mid-January. The seven FPU contracts since 2017 include six production semis and a small production barge. No production spars or TLPs have been ordered over the past five years. The latest spar order was in 2012. The last TLP order was in 2013.

Source: IMA/World Energy Reports Database

Production Floaters Now Being Built
Included among the 29 production floaters now being built are 22 FPSOs, six production semis and a production barge. A third of these units are well into the construction program, with production start planned in 2020/21. Two-thirds are more recent contracts where construction is at an earlier stage and production start is planned in 2022/24.

Seven (32%) of the 22 FPSOs being built are for use offshore Brazil. The rest are for use offshore West Africa (three), Guyana (two), Northern Europe (two), India (two) – and Mexico, Israel, China and Australia (one unit each). The remaining two FPSOs are speculative hulls that at the moment have no field assignment – but are likely to be used on future contracts in Guyana or Brazil.

Thirteen of the FPSOs are being built on new hulls. Nine are conversions or upgrades to existing units. China is clearly the major location for FPSO construction and conversions. Eighteen of the 22 FPSOs on order are partially or fully contracted to Chinese yards. Singapore has retained second position, with three orders. One FPSO contract has been placed in Korea. Topsides plant fabrication and integration is spread over a variety of contractors in Asia, Europe and Brazil.

Five of the six production semis now being built are destined for use in the Gulf of Mexico. The remaining unit is for use offshore China. Construction of these semis is divided among builders in Korea, China and Singapore – each location having two production semi contracts. Some topside fabrication and integration is being performed in the US.

(Photo: SBM Offshore)

Projects in the Planning Stage
We have been tracking 130 projects in the planning stage that are likely to require a production floater for development. They include 118 projects where an FPSO is the likely production solution, 12 where a production semi is likely to be required. Brazil is the dominant location for future production floater requirements – with 38 projects in the planning queue. Other major locations with floater projects in the planning stage are Africa (30 projects), Southeast Asiea (16 projects), Northern Europe (12 projects) and the Mexico/US Gulf of Mexico (10 projects).

Some of the projects are near term, some further out. Of the total, eight projects are at the bidding or contract negotiation stage. Another 10 are in the near term investment queue and eight are in front-end engineering design (FEED) stage. Another 79 projects are further out in the planning stage – either in development concept definition (45), exploration and appraisal (25), priority prospect (seven) or commercial framework negotiation (two).

The remaining 25 projects in the planning queue are stalled. Some are stalled due to economics. Some are awaiting field partner or agreement on field commercial terms. Others are stalled by government opposition, field rights issues, operator failure or sanctions that prevent the project moving forward (Exhibit 4).

Source: IMA/World Energy Reports Database

Five Year Outlook for Contracts
While 130 FPSO/FPU projects are at various stages of development planning, underlying market conditions will influence if and when individual projects move forward to the investment commitment and placement of a floater construction contract.

IMA/WER each year looks in detail at conditions likely to exist in the deepwater market over the following five years. Here’s how we see the market situation between 2020 and 2024.

In the (mostly) positive category are:

  • Future demand growth – Oil demand is likely to grow 0.9 to 1.3% annually through the 2020s, then taper off in the 2030/50 timeframe, perhaps eventually peak in the second half of the century.
  • Deepwater future supply role – Deepwater production now accounts for approximately 10% of global oil supply and we expect it will continue to provide 8 to 12% of world oil supply over the next 20+ years.
  • Supply disruption risk – Global supply of oil and natural gas is fragile and the possibility of major supply disruptions very real; the disruption threat incentivizes investment in deepwater development as a supply security cushion.
  • Oil prices – We expect Brent crude to trade in the $55 to $65 price range over the next five years, gradually increasing to $70 to $75 through 2035 in our most likely scenario.
  • Deepwater/shale competiveness – While tight/shale rock development remains the major competitor to deepwater investment, productivity gains are slowing, creating upward pressure on tight/shale rock breakeven price.
  • Cost of capital for deepwater exploration and production (E&P) – The deepwater sector remains attractive to banks, hedge funds and others, and financing is readily available for production floaters backed by long-term lease with substantive counterparty.
  • Access to Brazilian deepwater resources – The government has been opening foreign investment opportunities in Brazilian offshore resources and has relaxed some local content requirements.

In the (mostly) negative category are

  • Engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractor constraints – Capacity of major FPSO leasing contractors to simultaneously perform multiple large FPSO EPC+ lease contracts could constrain the near term pace of FPSO projects. E.g., Modec now has seven large FPSO contracts at various stages of completion. Modec has never had a backlog this large – execution of which will test the depth of the company’s project management capabilities.  
  • Upstream investment constraints – Capital spending on upstream projects continues to be weak as oil companies emphasize “fiscal discipline” and set-aside available cash for dividends, stock buybacks.

In the unknown category are

  • Black swans – Negative and positive unexpected events impacting activity in the deepwater sector will undoubtedly occur over the next five years. They have in the past – e.g., 2010 Macondo oil spill.

Based on our analysis of future market conditions, we are forecasting orders for 41 to 56 FPSOs and eight to 12 FPUs between 2020 and 2024. The construction contracts are expected to generate expenditures of $56 to $77 billion. Brazil is expected to account for 30% to 40% of the FPSO orders over the next five years. Africa is expected to be the second largest source of FPSO activity, with around 25% of the orders. Next in line are Northern Europe and Southeast Asia/China, each with around 10%.

We expect that 20% to 25% of FSPO projects over the next five years will involve use of a redeployed FPSO. Assuming the most likely forecast scenario, we expect 10 to 13 FPSO projects will entail redeployments. FPU orders over the next five years will be principally, if not wholly, comprised of production semis. Most will be for projects in the US Gulf of Mexico or offshore Australia.

No TLP and few spar projects are currently visible.

Source: IMA/World Energy Reports Database


Details for the 2020 production floater forecast are provided in the IMA/WER market outlook report issued in late 2019. We examine timing of EPC contracts, sources of buying power, floater procurement strategy, use of redeployed FPSOs, competitive landscape, etc. In our monthly reports we track how actual order intake correlates with the forecast and in March of each year we recalibrate the forecast to reflect changes in market situation. For information about the 2020 Floating Production Report and Database, please visit: www.worldenergyreports.com

Or contact:

Paul Morris
[email protected]
+1 212 477 6944

This article has been published in the January/February 2020 edition of Offshore Engineer magazine

Read more articles

Offshore Engineer Magazine Archive

Current News

Financial Close Reached for 298MW Offshore Wind Project in Taiwan

Financial Close Reached for  298MW Offshore Wind Project in Taiwan

Stena Drilling Confirms Samsung Drillship Deal

Stena Drilling Confirms Samsung Drillship Deal

OMV Petrom Could Delay Black Sea Gas Project FID Pending Tax Change

OMV Petrom Could Delay Black Sea Gas Project FID Pending Tax Change

Op-ed: Cambo: How the UK Needs New Oil and Gas Fields - It's Part of Going Green, Says Industry Expert

Op-ed: Cambo: How the UK Needs New Oil and Gas Fields - It's Part of Going Green, Says Industry Expert

Subscribe for OE Digital E‑News

Offshore Engineer Magazine